|
Please visit the LangaList Home Page Please note: Older issues may contain information that is now out of date How To
Subscribe and Unsubscribe is at the end of this
note. Mailing List Trouble? See
http://langa.com/help.htm Please recommend the LangaList to a friend! (And maybe win a prize!) An easier-to read formatted
HTML version of this newsletter is available The
LangaList 2004-07-15 Please visit our sponsors and help keep the LangaList S.E. free!
--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---
--------------( the above is an advertisement )------------- 1) More On The New Windows UpdateIt's coming soon--- a new version of Windows Update that's now in beta, but that soon will replace the existing Windows Update for the general public. The new Update process (comprising the software that resides on your PC and a new Update site that coordinates with that software) has different defaults and behaves somewhat differently from the Update you're probably used to. Some changes--- such as the look and feel of the site--- are merely cosmetic, but other changes go deeper: Take a look: The new article at Click on over to Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---
--------------( the above is an advertisement )------------- 2) System Restore Failures (XP and WinME)
Let's deal with this in two parts: First, the meta-answer: System Restore is only a lightweight safety net. It's designed as a tool to try to get your system running again after a major problem; until you can make permanent fixes. Think of System Restore as one of those little "doughnut" mini-tires that most cars have as spares these days: They're meant to be used when you have a flat; they'll let you roll at reduced speed and with degraded handling to the nearest service station, where your main tire can be repaired permanently. Those mini-tires are not meant to be used in routine driving. Likewise System Restore is a limited tool, and not meant as a primary means to preserve your PC's setup. Tools like Go Back are a little more robust, but even Go Back's own creators say that it should not--- NOT--- be used as a primary means of preserving your system. Think of Go Back as an emergency mini-tire with higher speed limits, better handling and longer tread life. But it's still not meant as full-time replacement for a "real" tire. But I know I'm swimming against the tide here because many people do use Go Back and System Restore as their sole or primary backup tool. Because the software *can* work this way, it may seem that everything's OK. But consider: Some people drive for long distances and at high speed on their mini-spare tires, too. Just because the tires don't instantly blow out doesn't mean that such use is a good idea. 8-) And that leads to Jerry's specific question: There are many, many reasons why a System Restore may fail. For example, see "Why are previous restore points not working?" in the "Troubleshooting" section of this official Microsoft page: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/plan/faqsrwxp.mspx There's lots more on that page that's worth reading too. Note especially the sections on "Does System Restore protect personal data files?" (the short answer: no); "What should I do if System Restore does not work?"; "Why are my restore points missing or deleted?"; "Why does the System Restore Wizard lockup?"; and so on. Just a few minutes on that page ought to convince just about anyone that System Restore is not intended for heavy-duty system protection! More info: There's also a fuller explanation of the pros and cons of the three major kinds of tools for restoring a system, or "going back" after a problem: If you're relying on Go Back or System Restore as a primary (or only) means of preserving your system's settings, I urge you to take a look: Five minutes reading might save you a world of hurt later on. See http://langa.com/newsletters/2001/2001-12-03.htm#1 Click to email this item to a
friend 3) Watch Your "SpeedStep"The specific question here relates to overheating laptops, but you may find that the answer also contains some useful general info on automatic-speed switching in mobile CPUs:
SpeedStep is mainly intended as a power-saving feature to extend battery life on laptops: When it kicks in, it can cut a CPU's power consumption by 66-75%--- a huge amount. But, in the process, the CPU's speed drops, too. Most SpeedStep-equipped laptops let you play with the settings somewhat to adjust the tradeoffs between speed and power consumption. But in all CPUs, the energy consumed ends up as heat, so reducing the power consumption also reduces the CPU's heat. Thus, SpeedStep also can serve as a way to keep a CPU from cooking itself to death: When things get too toasty, SpeedStep can lower the CPU's speed to reduce power consumption, in order to let the CPU run cooler. This is what Marcel ran into. You can see some typical power savings afforded by SpeedStep here: Lots more info: And finally, Marcel's experience also shows why it can be
good to check the temperatures of *any* system you use--- notebook, desktop,
whatever. And there's plenty of free software available to let you see what's
going on with your system fans and temperatures. See: Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList S.E. Free! ) --- "Hi Fred, Hey, I signed up for the Plus
edition and got my 1st one today. -------------( the above is an advertisement )-------------- 4) More: "Missing HAL"In NT/2K/XP, the OS uses a "hardware abstraction layer" to isolate and insulate your software from direct interaction with your system's hardware: Software can only talk to the hardware via the HAL. This means that a misbehaving program usually can't knock the hardware legs out from beneath the entire OS, as sometimes used to happen with Win9x and ME--- there, one bad app could bring down the whole system by locking up or hogging some critical hardware element. With HAL, an app may still crash, but it's far less likely to affect other running apps or the OS as a whole. In fact, HAL is one of the cornerstone reasons why NT/2K/XP have a justified reputation for being much harder to crash than Win9x. Because HAL is a fundamental part of NT/2K/XP, the system just won't work if HAL.DLL is trashed. Some of your fellow readers are running into this problem, and others are also finding their own workarounds:
If you have, or can borrow, an XP Setup CD--- not a "system restore" CD, but an actual installation CD, such as you get in the stand-alone retail version of XP--- you can boot from it, use the "Repair" (Recovery Console) option, and restore the file that way. See http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_haldll_missing.htm , especially the material towards the bottom of the page. There also are any number of tools that can give you read access to NTFS, but only a relative handful provide write access. http://www.google.com/search?q=xp+boot+disk+ntfs . Some Linux distributions can read plain (non-encrypted, non-compressed) NTFS partitions; fewer are able to write to such partitions, but it may be worth a look: http://www.google.com/search?q=linux+ntfs Or, for more general info on the "missing hal"
problem: Or, check out this:
Click to email this item to a
friend 5) The "Contig" Defrag TrickOur discussion of "Some Files Could Not Be Defragmented..." ( http://langa.com/newsletters/2004/2004-07-01.htm#2 ) led to some interesting email. For example, in the original item (above) I said:
That prompted this reader to write about his trick for defragging *everything*:
Thanks, Walter. So: Yes, you can get everything fully defragged if you really want to; Contig is available here: http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/contig.shtml or here http://www.google.com/search?q=contig But, as I thought, and as Walter proved, it's probably not worth the hassle. If your standard tools get your disk fragmentation down to the low single digits, it's perfectly fine to declare victory and stop. 8-) Click to email this item to a
friend 6) Is This Newsletter Interesting? Useful?If you think the LangaList is a worthwhile read, maybe a
friend would find it useful too! Just use the following link to recommend the
LangaList---your friend may find a new source of useful information and you just
may win one of three FREE ONE YEAR SUBSCRIPTIONS to the LangaList Plus! edition
given each month. (If your name is drawn and you're already a Plus! subscriber,
your current subscription will be extended by a full year.) Click to email this item to a
friend 7) Separate Emails On Multi-User Systems
That could be *very* handy on shared systems. thanks, Ramesh! Click to email this item to a
friend 8) They Just Keep Coming And Coming...Well over 3,000 of your fellow readers have "loaded the
code." Have you? Check out
http://langa.com/code.htm for the details. Manually Browse All Posted-to-Date Sites Starting At Freeware And Website Reviews Computer Shop Cat Queen 1 Good Reason (web design) Ria Schuch's Blogs eBooks PrairieGroove Hosting Beleek Pottery PCtorium Peter Verstegen's Blog (Au) Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList S.E. Free! ) --- Fred's Reference Shelf--- And Up To
20% Discounts! --------------( the above is an advertisement )-------------- 9) Free Telephony Via SkypeYou probably already know about peer-to-peer (p2p) file sharing programs like Kazaa. Now, the same folks who developed that have gone in another direction with a free tool that shares voices instead of files: It's free p2p internet telephony:
Thanks, Theo. The software itself is free, and you can call other Skype users for free. If you want to reach non-Skype users--- people with ordinary phones--- a low-cost add-on service called SkypeOut lets you connect for about $0.015 (a cent and a half) a minute. (You can get the exact current rates from the site.) That's a very low cost--- much lower than most phone plans. Skype is ad-free, and--- unlike the early Kazaa--- is apparently free from spyware, adware, and the like. Also unlike Kazaa, Skype has no legal clouds hanging over it: It's totally legit. Skype has several competitors, and will have more in the future as some huge Telcos move in to "VoIP, or "voice over IP;" but for now the tiny http://www.freeworlddialup.com/ appears to be the closest alternative. If you'd like more third-party info, there's a seemingly well-balanced independent review posted here (free signup required to access article): http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/business/national/8357609.htm?1c Click to email this item to a
friend 10) Just For Grins
Thanks, Bill, Actually, I think that page is amazingly accurate! 8-) Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---
--------------( the above is an advertisement )------------- 11) Plus! Edition Highlights:
The Plus! edition is only pennies per issue, and comes with a MONEY BACK GUARANTEE from Fred. How can you lose Check out the details: http://langa.com/plus.htm Click to email this item to a
friend (Give a gift subscription to
the LangaList Plus edition! See you in one week, on, 2004-07-26! Best, An easier-to read formatted HTML version is available in the "Current Issue" section of http://langa.com. (The HTML version of each issue normally is available by 9AM EST [UT-5] of the issue date.) All past LangaList issues are also available at the Langa.Com site. UNSUBSCRIBE (instant removal!):
http://langa.com/leave_langalist.htm CHANGE ADDRESS? LIST TROUBLE? HAVE QUESTIONS? OTHER PROBLEM? NEED HELP? See http://langa.com/help.htm This newsletter is SPAM PROOF and requires two levels of subscriber confirmation
before delivery begins: See
http://langa.com/info.htm |
|
|
Please visit the LangaList Home Page |