Please visit the LangaList Home Page

Please note: Older issues may contain information that is now out of date


How To Subscribe and Unsubscribe is at the end of this note. Mailing List Trouble? See http://www.langa.com/help.htm
Questions about the advertisers? See the end of this note. Please also see legal notices at the end of this note. LangaList: ISSN 1533-1156

Please recommend the LangaList to a friend! (And maybe win $10,000 !)

An easier-to read formatted HTML version of this newsletter is available
<a href=" http://www.langa.com/newsletters/2003/2003-03-27.htm ">here</a>

The LangaList
Standard Edition

2003-03-27

A Free Email Newsletter from Fred Langa
That Helps You Get More From Your Hardware, 
Software, and Time Online

Please visit our sponsors and help keep the LangaList S.E. free!

Contents:

1) Fred Trips Over Own Security Measures
2) Karen's Free "Replicator" Saves Public Radio!
3) SpyBot and BeClean Problems
4) LCD "Contrast Ratio?"
5) Fat32 and NTFS
6) Recommend It!
7) Third-Party/Independent Update Site?
8) They Loaded The Code
9) Going To Washington DC In April?
10) Just For Grins
11) Plus! Edition Highlights:

 

--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList S.E. Free! ) ---

Need To Become Self-Sufficient About Win98?
Switching To XP? Need Answers about
ANY version of Windows?

Check out computer-related books personally recommended
by Fred Langa and available at Amazon.Com's deepest discounts!

<a href=" http://www.langa.com/books.htm ">Click!</a>

--------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------

 

1) Fred Trips Over Own Security Measures

Many readers pointed out an error in the last issue, one inadvertently caused by my own security measures. For example, Ron Scheldrup sent in this gentle correction:

Whoops! Sorry to have to say this Fred, but it looks like you goofed on one of your main points about the difference between XP Pro & Home versions in the 2003-03-24 newsletter.

My only experience is with XP Home, and I've got my desktop PC set up to use "Fast User Switching."

Just go to Control Panel, select User Accounts, and click on "Change the way users log on or off." From there, you can choose to use the Welcome Screen and enable or disable Fast User Switching. With Fast User Switching turned on, use <Winkey> + <L>, or choose Start, Log Off and then you can choose between Switch User (for fast switching) or Log Off (for the traditional log all the way off and restart).

When you bring up Task Manager (<ctrl> + <alt> + <del>), you can click on the Users tab and see who else's logged in. Assuming you've got administrative rights, you can even log them off without switching. Pretty cool stuff!

Please don't take this too hard. With all the stuff going on in the world these days, everyone's entitled to a minor mistake now and then. In any case, keep up the good work! ---Ron Scheldrup, Loyal Plus subscriber

Thank you, Ron, and all the others (blush!) who wrote in. You're right--- by default, XP does provide Fast User Switching.

But when I went to research the original item, I used the closest PC that had XP Home running, and it did NOT have "Fast User Switching." In fact, it still doesn't. Let me explain:

By default, when XP is installed with multiple users, it employs a "friendly" logon process where all user names are displayed on the Welcome screen. You click on your name, enter the password, and you're in.

While that's indeed friendly--- and fine in most cases--- it also slightly reduces your security because it displays all valid logons to anyone who can get to the Welcome screen. And, although the passwords aren't shown, the friendly logon will provide a hint to help you remember your password. This makes things easier for potential hackers--- all the valid user names are shown openly, and there are even explicit hints about what the passwords are.

But XP also provides a "classic" logon as a more secure alternative to the "friendly" logon. In the classic logon, you're simply presented with a name/password dialog box. The most-recently-used name does appear automatically, but no other names are shown at all: You have to know them, and type them in manually. No password hints are given for any user; you have to know your password cold, or you don't get in, simple as that.

In most cases, the friendly logon is fine. But in my case, because I have a cleaning crew come through my office once a  week, I wanted to avoid creating a temptation, so I enabled the classic logon for that shared XP Home box, which is always running, 24/7. The default user is a limited account that can't do much; this is the only name that someone would see in the logon box, and they'd still have to guess the password, with no hints given.

The more dangerous Administrator-level accounts on that machine have obscure names that would be hard for an unauthorized user to guess; and they're also protected by good, hint-less passwords. This small extra step makes it harder for a casual hacker--- say, a bored member of the cleaning crew--- to break into the machine in the short time they're allowed to be alone with the PC.

But here's the catch: If you turn off the "friendly" logons, you also disable Fast User Switching. Thus, when I went looking to see about Fast user Switching on that PC, it wasn't there. I'd simply forgotten that it went away as a secondary consequence of using the classic logon method.

So: My error was in using a modified, production PC to verify this operating system feature. I should have used a pristine, fresh install of the OS. My apologies!

The silver lining to this is that we've now had the opportunity to talk about "classic" versus "friendly" logons. <g> If you'd like to try the slightly more secure classic logon, you may easily do so: From an Admin account, go to Control Panel/User Accounts, and select "Change the Way Users Log On or Off." If you deselect "Use the Welcome Screen," you'll see that "Fast User Switching" also goes away.

As Ron says, you also can separately just turn Fast User Switching on or off via the same menu, although that's not what tripped me up--- I would have remembered doing that. Fast User Switching gets turned off *as a secondary consequence* of selecting the classic logon, and I (blush) did not remember that.

BTW: The above works on both XP Home and Pro. Believe me, I checked on non-modified, pristine copies. <g>

My apologies for the earlier error.

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

2) Karen's Free "Replicator" Saves Public Radio!

I got this note with the subject "HELP...we're in big trouble...:" from the IT Director of Public Radio International, in Minnesota:

Fred, We're in a tough spot, and wondered if you could help...urgently...

We migrated our file server to a temporary home so that we could update the real file server box to NT2000. In the process of moving files back to the updated box, we found (after three days) that not ALL files moved back over.

So, we're now faced with a synchronization issue between the old version of the file server and the new (partial) file server. New docs have been saved to the new server, so we can't just overwrite each folder with the folder from the temporary server.

Do you know of a synchronization utility that can look at both servers and sync the file folders so that both servers end up with the latest version of everything? They're both in the same Active Directory domain.

So much for the consultant that did this to us!

Thanks. ---Richard Ruotolo, Director of IT, Public Radio International ,Minneapolis, MN

I replied:

Try this simple tool: http://www.karenware.com/powertools/ptreplicator.asp  It's free, and you could be using it minutes from now. It can be configured to synch any two disks/folder/whatever; overwriting older but not newer files. Optionally, it can synch file deletions across folders too, but that's not what you need right now....

To synch both systems, you'd have to run the tool twice. I'd suggest running it first from the "temporary home" to the new server. That will add whatever files are missing on the new server, without overwriting the new stuff. Then, I'd do the same thing in reverse, to mirror the new server back to the temporary server. It'll take a while, and it's not fancy, but it'll work.

I soon heard back: Indeed, it worked!

I regularly use Karen's Replicator to keep my laptop in synch with my main desktop PC, and to synch several libraries of software I have spread over various drives. On a LAN, Karen's free tool is just as fast as some commercial synching tools, like Laplink. It's a really nice little program!

Check out all of Karen's stuff: http://www.karenware.com

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---

--------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------

3) SpyBot and BeClean Problems

Two promising pieces of free software have been causing trouble for some readers. First, Spybot:

Dear Fred, I took your advice a few months ago and switched from Ad-Aware to SpyBot S&D (and good riddance to Ad-Aware!). Everything was fine, I had my settings customized...and then along comes an update that changes everything! For whatever reason, my settings are no longer saved - after I went through and changed them from the new defaults back to how I had them - even though I selected the "save all settings" button. I can't get rid of the confirmation each time I "fix" something, and I have to change my settings each & every time I run the program. Am I missing something? Their help content is really no help at all! And while I will not go back to using Ad-Aware, I'm extremely frustrated with S&D right now! Thanks in advance, Jen Richard

Me too, Jen. It's best to uninstall the old Spybot version, and give the new one a fresh start, but even then you're not out of the woods: The new version is also hard to download and update (too many people trying it at once?), and has several very-poorly-described new features whose operation is somewhat mysterious. I need to know more about what's actually going on before I can tell if the new features (like "Immunize") are really worthwhile.

I'm assuming most of this is Spybot's growing pains, and if things improve soon, perhaps Spybot will again rate an unqualified thumbs-up. But for now, caution is advised, as it is with BeClean:

Dear Fred: I received your new Plus letter and installed the "Be Clean" programme. It seemed to work all-right with temp-files etc. I then used the registry-clean, and everything went wrong !  It seems to have lost the connections from Start to the program files plus a lot of other things. I couldn't close my PC. I tried to go back to a former version (Safe start), but without any success. I had to install (repair) my XP Home and in that lost 4 days work (my fault, because I hadn't backup'ed). I could be, that I have done something wrong, but please check it and send out a warning if there is anything the matter. ---Leo Brinch

While no software works for everyone all the time, I've heard from an unusually large number of readers who had trouble with BeClean. The trouble isn't universal--- BeClean also has worked fine for many--- it even got a 4.5-out-of-5 star rating at WebAttack. But until the software author sorts out what's causing some users to have major trouble, it'd probably be better to stick with tried-and-true disk cleanup tools like http://www.langa.com/cleanup_bat.htm, and known-good Registry cleaners like http://www.vtoy.fi/jv16/shtml/jv16powertools.shtml .

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

4) LCD "Contrast Ratio?"

There's something I can't find explained anywhere. I went shopping for a 17" LCD monitor and one of the specs is Contrast Ratio. It is listed as 500:1, 400:1 or 350:1. What does this mean and what is better, a higher number or a lower one?---Peter Metcalf

In screen technology, contrast ratio is a number representing the relative difference in intensity between the whitest whites to the blackest blacks. Generally speaking,  the higher the number the better, because you want whites and blacks to be as different as possible!

Old, reflective grey-on-green passive LCDs had contrast ratios of only around 15:1; text and images were washed out, and the screens had to be held "just right" to be readable. Cheap, active, backlit LCDs mostly get above 100:1 now, although no one would want to read text on such a screen all day.

Most decent LCDs now ship with contrast ratios in the 350-600:1 range, and that's getting pretty good on the high end: For comparison, a conventional 35mm slide has a contrast ratio of around 500:1 (albeit with much higher resolution than any LCD).

Some special screen technologies go higher. For example, some  plasma screens offer 1000:1 contrast ratios (example:
http://www.digitalconnection.com/Products/Plasma/pdp503cmx.asp ) and a few vendors are shipping specialty screens with 3000:1 ratios:
http://www.presentationmaster.com/2002/11_nov/news/cw_necht1000.htm
http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20020614S0126

So, the broad generalization is that higher contrast ratios are better, just as higher resolutions are generally better. But--- and it's a huge "but"--- don't buy any LCD just on specs. You really need to see it with your own eyes to know what will be OK to you over hours and hours and hours of viewing. See http://www.langa.com/newsletters/2003/2003-03-20.htm#1 for more info.

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

5) Fat32 and NTFS

Dear Fred, In today's issue about the pros and cons of XP Home and Pro, you stated that the security was better with the Pro version.

When I had to upgrade because 95 got dumped, I chose the Home edition for precisely the opposite reason, I guess, and would love to know if my understanding of the situation was correct.

I wanted to run a Linux version on my computer and had read somewhere that the desktop versions wouldn't run on a machine that was formatted to take the new file type. I was told that you had to retain the FAT32, which you apparently can't do with the Pro version of XP.

If that is true, maybe some other people would appreciate a heads up? ---Marilyn J

Well, there's a couple things going on in your question:

First, although NTFS (the "NT File System") is the default for all versions of XP, both XP Pro and Home can and will usually install and run just fine on drives formatted in Win98-style FAT32. 

You do give up some features with FAT32, such as the ability to use XP's built-in file encryption, or automatic compression of little-used files; or to format very large hard drives at initial installation. See "Limitations of the FAT32 File System in Windows XP" at http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=314463, and "Description of the FAT32 File System in Windows XP" at
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;310525

This article gives the Microsoft spin on choosing which file system is best for Windows. Note that although the article references Win2K, the same logic applies for XP: http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/en/server/help/choosing_between_NTFS_FAT_and_FAT32.htm

In general, it's usually better to use NTFS if you can.

Second, it's true that Linux can't be installed onto an NTFS partition. In fact, Linux prefers to use its own file system, "ext2," although there are ways to get Linux to work on  some other file systems.

Usually, to run Linux and XP--- or Win9X or any other OS--- it's best to set up separate partitions, each of which can be formatted in whatever file system type the OS prefers. That way, Linux can have an ext2 partition, XP can have an NTFS partition, Win98 can have a FAT32 partition, and so on.

Keeping things separate not only allows each OS to have the file system it prefers, but also keeps the OSes from stepping on each other's toes. In fact, this is the essence of "dual booting." More info: http://www.google.com/search?as_q=boot+manager&as_sitesearch=langa.com and
http://www.google.com/search?q=boot+manager

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---

--------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------

6) Recommend It!

If you think the LangaList is a worthwhile read, just use the following link to recommend the LangaList to a friend. Your friend just may find a new source of useful information; I just may gain a new subscriber; and you just may win $10,000 for your trouble (full details also available via this link):
http://www.recommend-it.com/l.z.e?s=143182

Or, win a no-strings $30 Gift Certificate for any item at Amazon.Com--- books, software, hardware, kitchenware, toys... and more. To have a shot at winning, just use the following link to recommend the LangaList to a friend. Your friend just may find a new source of useful information; I just may gain a new subscriber; and you just may win a $30 Gift Certificate! (Full details also available via this link):
http://www.langa.com/recommend.htm

Either way, thank you again, and good luck!

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

7) Third-Party/Independent Update Site?

Hey Fred! I used to use CNET's Catch-Up software update program before they moth-balled it. Are there any other reputable, safe and free services like this out there? Might be a good reader tip........ Peace, Peter Sinclair

"BigFix" has been around for a long time, and is still going strong at http://www.bigfix.com

Past coverage: http://www.google.com/search?as_q=bigfix&as_sitesearch=langa.com

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

8) They Loaded The Code

Do you have a home page or website? (It doesn't matter what size.) Please click over to http://www.langa.com/code.htm , and maybe you can join the hundreds and hundreds of LangaList readers who have "Loaded the Code!" (If you've already "Loaded The Code" and are wondering if your site will appear here or on the Langa.Com web site, please see http://www.langa.com/link.txt )

Speaking of which: Here's another eclectic sample of reader sites--- some professional, some very personal:

View A Randomly-Chosen Reader Site
http://www.langa.com/randomlink.htm

Manually Browse All Posted-to-Date Sites Starting At
http://www.langa.com/readersites.htm

The Big Zee home page
http://zaske.r.home.att.net/

The Bill Johns Home Page
http://www.alltel.net/~billjohns/index.html

Web Design by Puamana
http://www.puamana.net/index.html

The Walrus
http://members.shaw.ca/high5/

Siempre
http://www.siempre.us/

W.Va Justin's-Sportsmen-Location-Links
http://www.jfhm.com/Pages/location.htm

Designs on You
http://www.designsonyou.com/Index.html

Joyzine (Australia)
http://www.artistwd.com/joyzine/

Search2Go
http://www.search2go.net/

Weather Info (USA)
http://usskywatch.tripod.com/

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---

--------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------

9) Going To Washington DC In April?

Greetings, This is one forum I'd love to attend. http://www.ftc.gov/os/2003/02/pubforum_spamemail.htm  Just thought I'd pass this along to you in case you've missed it.  Regards, Glenn E. Carper

Man, I'd love to be there, too. It's a "Public Forum: Spam Email" held by the US Government's Federal Trade Commission, running all day each day from April 30-May 2, 2003. Fourteen separate panels will discuss everything from the "daily experience" of spam among consumers, to blacklists, the use of embedded email tracking tricks ("beacons" and such), to emerging technologies and legal remedies.

Even though there are far larger issues to be dealt with in Washington these days, the level of spam has reached ridiculous proportions; and many current anti-spam tools (like blacklists) actually do far more harm than good.

I'm not a fan of intrusive government activity, but spam does need regulation, just as fax and telephone marketing is regulated.

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

10) Just For Grins

I recently ran a spoof piece in the "Just for Grins" section in http://www.langa.com/newsletters/2003/2003-03-20.htm ; it purported to announce the "discovery" of a new pirate-proof method of distributing music: the vinyl phonograph record.

Then this arrived:

With a grin stretching my face I reply to your grin. There is a "digital reader" for vinyl records http://www.elpj.com/ --- Jim Ronholm, James

It's a phonograph turntable that uses a laser instead of a stylus, and that connects to the Audio-In of your PC (or any amplifier), so you can indeed play vinyl records on your PC.

But many other readers sent in an even more amazing link--- one that made my jaw drop: A guy named Ofer Springer decided to see if he could optically scan a vinyl record (on a standard flatbed scanner) and digitally process the image, via software, to extract the music.

He succeeded: http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~springer/

That's got to be one of the best tech tour de forces--- and coolest hacks--- in a long, long time!

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList S.E. Free! ) ---

--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---

--------------( the above is an advertisement )--------------

11) Plus! Edition Highlights:

  • More Easy Symbols
        (free tools for adding nonstandard characters)

  • Does "Bouncing" Spam Work?
        (does a "bounce" reduce or increase your spam load?)

  • Free "Amazing Graphic Tool"
        (awesome free tool outperforms Photoshop in some areas)

DID YOU KNOW that Plus! subscribers have access to over 100,000 additional words of special features, extra content and private links, all on a private web site? All that, plus 30% more content in every issue, for just a dollar a month.

Full Plus! Edition info: http://www.langa.com/plus.htm 

Click to email this item to a friend
http://www.langa.com/sendit2.htm

return to top of page

See you next issue!

Best,

Fred
( Editor@Langa.Com )


Please recommend the LangaList to a friend! (And maybe win $10,000!I)

An easier-to read formatted HTML version is available in the "Current Issue" section of http://www.langa.com.  (The HTML version of each issue normally is available by 9AM EST [UT-5] of the issue date.) All past LangaList issues are also available at the Langa.Com site.

return to top of page


Administrivia:

UNSUBSCRIBE: From the same email account you used to sign up with), send an email to
unsubscribe-langalist@lyris.dundee.net

SUBSCRIBE (it's free!): Create and send a new email to
subscribe-langalist@lyris.dundee.net

CHANGE ADDRESS? LIST TROUBLE? HAVE QUESTIONS? OTHER PROBLEM? NEED HELP? See http://www.langa.com/help.htm

This newsletter is SPAM PROOF and requires two levels of subscriber confirmation before delivery begins: See http://www.langa.com/info.htm

About the advertisers: http://www.langa.com/privacy.htm#ads

Disclaimer: http://www.langa.com/legal.htm  In brief: All information herein is offered as-is and without warranty of any kind. Neither Langa Consulting LLC, nor its employees nor contributors are responsible for any loss, injury, or damage, direct or consequential, resulting from your choosing to use any information presented here.

This newsletter is a service of Langa Consulting LLC and is Copyright © 2003 Fred Langa / Langa Consulting LLC. All worldwide rights reserved. LangaList: ISSN 1533-1156

return to top of page


Please visit the LangaList Home Page