Please visit the LangaList Home Page

Please note: Older issues may contain information that is now out of date.


How To Subscribe and Unsubscribe is at the end of this note.
Mailing List Trouble? See http://www.langa.com/help.txt
Want an easier-to-read formatted HTML version? See http://www.langa.com/whats_new.htm
Advertising rates and info available at http://www.langa.com/rate_card.html

Please email the LangaList to a friend! (Use this super-fast form !)

The LangaList

12-Aug-99

A Free Email Newsletter from Fred Langa About BrowserTune, 
HotSpots, Columns, Tips & Tricks, and Other Activities 

In This Issue:
More Windows Versions Than Fleas On a Dog
Windows’ "Short Date Format" Discussion Continues

BT2K Update
Spammer's Dream: A Security Hole In Microsoft Exchange Server
Using a Cable Modem or DSL? Planning to, Some Day?
Yes, The Palm III Giveaway Is Real
Just For Grins
More!


More Windows Versions Than Fleas On a Dog

It started as an idle thought: I wanted to count up the current and near-term versions of Windows. I started to lose track at about three dozen! I bet I didn’t get them all, but here’s what I came up with:

A nontrivial number of businesses still run Windows 3.x (which includes 3.0, 3.1, 3.11, and Windows for Workgroups 3.1 and 3.11).

A very large number runs Windows 95 (including the original, plus the OSR1-, OSR2- or OSR2.5-modified a, b, or c versions in retail or OEM form).

A large and growing number runs Win98, or Win98 SP1, or Win98 “System Update” or Win98 Second Edition. There are retail and OEM versions here, too.

NT3 and 3.51 are still out there, as are the—what, four?---Service Pack versions of NT4 for the workstation, server, and terminal server editions…. And yes, there are retail and OEM flavors.

NT5, er, Windows 2000 is in beta, and should be out in a few months. (There are Professional, Server, and Advanced Server versions; no doubt there will be both retail and OEM version, too.)

Oops---can’t forget Windows CE 1.0, 2.0, 2.11, 2.2 and (soon) 3.0…

Next year, 'round midyear, Microsoft will probably release a shipping version of  “Millenium” and a beta of "Neptune," the next steps in the evolution of the Win9x desktop. On the Win2k side, we’ll almost surely also see the first Service Packs arrive next year, along with Janus, the Data Center version of Win2K that some are dubbing “The UNIX Killer.”

I've made all this the subject of this week's InformationWeek column: Drop by for more information on Janus, Neptune, and Millennium, and then join in the discussion: Are the many versions of Windows a sign of vigor or a sign that Microsoft has lost focus? Will Microsoft be able to pull it all back to a common codebase and if so, will that help Windows become more stable and reliable, or will Microsoft be reducing its product differentiation?

If you’re running Win9x, does “Millenium” interest you, or have you either decided to stay with what you have or jump to Win2K or Neptune? If you’re into bigger iron, do you think Janus will cut it, or is Microsoft out of its league?

 And what other versions of Windows did I miss? Join in the week-long discussion  at http://www.informationweek.com/langaletter !

 return to top of page

--------------( Please Visit This LangaList Sponsor!) ------------ 

--------------( the above is a paid advertisement )--------------

 

Windows’ "Short Date Format" Discussion Continues

Many of you have written about the "Short Date Format" scare, and have wondered whether or not to use a two or four-digit date.

If your PC is Y2K compliant (to find out, see http://content.techweb.com/winmag//library/1999/0101/fea0061.htm ) and if you've applied all the relevant Y2K patches (see http://www.microsoft.com/y2k/ ), Windows will correctly calculate dates regardless of whether you're using two or four digits. As far as the OS itself goes, it doesn't much matter which you choose.

But not all apps are happy with two-digit dates. And others have trouble if you switch date formats midstream. You may have to experiment to see what works best with your software.

Generally speaking, if you have the option, the safest choice is to use nonambiguous, four-digit dates whenever possible. But if you have an application that is locked into a two-digit format, then as long as the hardware and OS are Y2K compliant, you should still be OK with the two-digit format.

That is, if you have a choice: Canadian reader Marc Zaritsky points out something I never knew:

Hi Fred.

Just wanted to let you know about an interesting twist in the situation. While part of a Y2K test team at work, I discovered that only the regional setting of "English(United States)" actually allows Win95 and WinNT 4.0(!) users to set that sys-tray popup to use four-digit years.. If you use "English(Canadian)" (as I do) or any other non-US locale then the option doesn't even exist in the settings..

Talk about the Microsoft quest for global domination!

Best Regards from Canada,

Marc.

Very interesting, Marc, thanks!

Our Y2K discussion is still going on at the WinMag site--- and there's a whole new look to the Dialog Box discussions, too! Come check it out at http://content.techweb.com/winmag//columns/fred/1999/0809.htm

 return to top of page

BT2K Update

The feedback continues, and you've all collectively given me some great ideas on improving the operation and navigation of BT2K. Thanks!

It's great to get mails like this one from user Karen Herman:

Fred,

I just tried your browser tuner test and ran into a problem. When I got to the java script test - where the script scrolls across the screen, my browser froze up, and I was unable to complete the test. I've noticed a lot of this while surfing, but didn't know what was causing it - now I do.

This is great because Karen correctly realized that the freeze wasn't caused by BT2K but was caused by a problem within her browser, which BT2K was allowing her to isolate and identify. Now, Karen can check her Java settings or perhaps deinstall/reinstall her browser to try to fix things.

(In contrast, I also get letters that usually start with something nasty like "Thanks a lot, you moron! Your tests made my browser crash!..." Well, if your browser has a problem or instability, BT2K will find it. If it's a bad problem, your browser may even crash. But blaming BT2K for that is like blaming your dentist when he or she finds a cavity. The problem is in your browser---or in your tooth---not in the diagnostic that uncovers the problem. But I guess some users expect BT2K to magically detect problems without actually involving the browser. Man, if I could figure out how to test a browser without actually putting it through its paces.... Waitaminit! I know, I'll start the BrowserTune Psychic Network. Call this 900 number, and for just $5.99 a minute, I'll diagnose your browser by telepathy!  8-)  )

OK, back to reality: When browsers crash they can lose their "nonpersistent" or "per-session" cookies. As BT2K explains at the start, its cookies self-destruct at the end of the tests so as to leave no collected data behind. Trouble is, a browser test failure or crash also can cause the cookies to self-destruct, and that wipes out your interim test results.

I'm trying to walk a fine line here: I don't want BT2K to raise any concerns whatsoever about security or privacy, but I also don't want to make BT2K hard to use. I'm rethinking BT2K's approach to cookies, and have some ideas that might make BT2K able to resume an interrupted test without compromising your privacy in any way. Stay, er,  tuned.

Meanwhile, I've posted several minor updates to BT2K already, and will have a larger refresh posted Monday, Aug 16. BT2K still succeeds in >95% of cases, but I want to get the success rate even higher.

FYI: The BT2K full beta is at http://www.browsertune.com/bt2k/

The BT2K demo (think of it as "BT2K Lite") is still available at http://www.browsertune.com/bt2kdemo/

And the tried-and-true manual version of BrowserTune (BT98) awaits you at http://www.browsertune.com/bt98/

 return to top of page

--------------( Please Visit This LangaList Sponsor!) ------------

--------------( the above is a paid advertisement )--------------

A Spammer's Dream:
A Security Hole In Microsoft Exchange Server

Spammers often try to find mail servers with security holes: Once they find one, they use that server to relay or blast out a bazillion pieces of junk mail to every address they can find. Sometimes, you may notice what's clearly spam mail coming from the mail domain of a seemingly-legitimate company: The mail may have no name, but simply carry the domain in the From line (something like "From:  @company.com"). When you see something like that, it means a spammer found a back door into that company's mail server.

Turns out Microsoft's Exchange Server 5.5 has such a back door that allows hackers to "encapsulate" mail addresses and hijack the Server for spamming purposes.

If your or your company is using Exchange Server 5.5, grab a patch at
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/exchange/exchange-public/fixes/Eng/Exchg5.5/PostSP2/imc-fix
or get more information at
http://www.microsoft.com/security/bulletins/MS99-027faq.asp

 return to top of page

--------------( Please Visit This LangaList Sponsor! )------------

--------------( the above is an advertisement )-----------

Using a Cable Modem or DSL? Planning to, Some Day?

I got a cable modem a few months back, and not only did it save me $400 a month in ISDN fees, it boosted my throughput to LAN-like speeds.

But sometimes, it can be even better. Consider this:

Dear Fred.

I enjoy your newsletters and have found some very useful tips. The BT2K demo led me to an amazing discovery. I am using a cable modem on RoadRunner. The new system was just installed last May. Although my performance was much better than the 56k connection, the results from the BT2K said my throughput was much lower than the national average.

At first I took the "It's better than I had " attitude, until a friend received his RR connection. He told me he had downloaded Netscape 4.61 in under a minute. I found this hard to believe, because my downloads averaged about 2 meg per minute. I decide to try the registry tweaks at http://www.speedguide.net/Cable_modems/cable_registry.shtml

My average throughput, according to BT2K, had been averaging about 270kbps. After the tweaks, the average range has been from 533kbps to over 1200kbps. The real proof was in the download. Netscape 4.61 (15 M) downloaded in only 43 seconds. Most video files download and run within 3 to 5 seconds or so. I can't thank you enough for a tool that led to huge improvements.--- Thank you, Mike Romine

No, thank *you*, Mike! (The fixes above also work for DSL setups!)

 return to top of page

Yes, The Palm III Giveaway Is Real

In case you were wondering, Recommend-It's Palm III giveaway apparently is entirely real: I know of one person who did win one.

But I hope you'll use the Recommend-It service because you think the LangaList is a worthwhile read, not just to try to win a Palm III. 8-)

Either way, please use the following link to recommend the LangaList to a friend. Your friend just may find a new source of useful information; I just may gain a new subscriber; and you just may win a Palm III organizer for your trouble (full details also available via this link):

http://www.langa.com/recommend.htm#1

The "Recommend-It" service is an ad-based site (you’ll see banners and such). The advantages to you of using the Recommend-It service (above) are that you can win a Palm III and that you can add a personal message to your LangaList recommendation.

But if you’d rather use the tried-and-true, ad-free recommendation form, you’ll still find it at: http://www.langa.com/recommend.htm#2 .  You can’t win anything there—except my thanks for helping the LangaList to grow!

In fact, either way, thank you!

 return to top of page

Just For Grins: 

A reader who asked to remain anonymous sent in this fictitious script of a dialog in a Microsoft restaurant:

Patron: Waiter!

Waiter: Hi, my name is Bill, and I'll be your Support Waiter. What seems to be the problem?

Patron: There's a fly in my soup!

Waiter: Try again, maybe the fly won't be there this time.

Patron: No, it's still there.

Waiter: Maybe it's the way you're using the soup. Try eating it with a fork instead.

Patron: Even when I use the fork, the fly is still there.

Waiter: Maybe the soup is incompatible with the bowl. What kind of bowl are you using?

Patron: A SOUP bowl!

Waiter: Hmmm, that should work. Maybe it's a configuration problem. How was the bowl set up?

Patron: You brought it to me on a saucer. What has that to do with the fly in my soup?!

Waiter: Can you remember everything you did before you noticed the fly in your soup?

Patron: I sat down and ordered the Soup of the Day!

Waiter: Have you considered upgrading to the latest Soup of the Day?

Patron: You have more than one Soup of the Day each day??

Waiter: Yes, the Soup of the Day is changed every hour.

Patron: Well, what is the Soup of the Day now?

Waiter: The current Soup of the Day is tomato.

Patron: Fine. Bring me the tomato soup, and the check. I'm running late

now. [waiter leaves and returns with another bowl of soup and the check]

Waiter: Here you are, sir. The soup and your check.

Patron: This is potato soup.

Waiter: Yes, the tomato soup wasn't ready yet.

Patron: Well, I'm so hungry now, I'll eat anything. [waiter leaves.]

Patron: Waiter! There's a gnat in my soup!

The check:

Soup of the Day . . . . . . ..............$5.00
Upgrade to newer Soup of the Day......... $2.50
Access to support . . . . . ............. $1.00


return to top of page 

 

See you next issue!

Best,

Fred

( fred@langa.com )

--------------( your ad here?)------------ 

It costs less than you think!
See http://www.langa.com/rate_card.html

--------------( )--------------

(P.S. Please email the LangaList to a friend! Use this super-fast form !)

LangaList advertising rates and info available at http://www.langa.com/rate_card.html

An easier-to-read formatted HTML version is available in the "what's new" section of http://www.langa.com .  All past LangaList issues are also available via the same link.

return to top of page


Administrivia: Why are you getting this newsletter? There are only two ways to get on the list (direct email request or via the WinMag mail list signup page) so if you're getting this newsletter; your name came to me through one of those channels. 

SUBSCRIBE (it's free!): Send email to subscribe-langalist@lyris.dundee.net

UNSUBSCRIBE: Send email to unsubscribe-langalist@lyris.dundee.net

LIST TROUBLE? CHANGE OF ADDRESS? HAVE QUESTIONS? NEED HELP? 
See http://www.langa.com/help.txt

This newsletter is a free service of Langa Consulting LLC and is Copyright © 1999 Langa Consulting LLC. All rights reserved. 

return to top of page